Priorização de critérios técnicos visando automatizar o processo de aceitação de projetos aeroportuários junto à Secretaria Nacional de Aviação Civil (SAC)
- Ítalo Guedes dos Santos
- Nakita Naiades Nascimento de Souza
- Max Lira Veras Xavier de Andrade
- Gustavo Viana de Sousa Barbosa
- Viviane Adriano Falcão
- Adriana Lima Rolim
- Mariana Emidio Guimarães
- Emerson Rodrigues André Melo
- Rômulo de Azevedo Gomes
- Marcio Maffili Fernandes
- Flávio Souza
- Renata Martins Batista
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · Secretaria Nacional de Aviação Civil
- Event
- XXII SITRAER – Brasília, DF, Brasil, October 22–24, 2025
- Volume
- Anais do XXII Simpósio de Transporte Aéreo – SITRAER 2025 · ISBN 978-65-272-2024-4 · DOI 10.29327/9786527220244
- Publisher
- Even3 Publicações
- Editors
- Fabiana Serra de Arruda, Camila Lucena, Giovanna Miceli Ronzani Borille, Evandro José da Silva
Resumo
Regional aviation plays a strategic role in Brazil’s economic and social development. In this context, the National Civil Aviation Secretariat (SAC) holds a key position in formulating and implementing public policies, managing resources from the National Civil Aviation Fund (FNAC), coordinating Brazil's representation before international aviation bodies, and, most notably, overseeing airport infrastructure projects nationwide. Focusing on this last aspect, this study presents results from a Decentralized Execution Term (TED) signed between SAC and the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), which aims to enhance the audit process of Airport Projects (PA) submitted to SAC’s Airport Project Coordination Unit (CGPA). The initiative proposes the development of an automated verification process for regulatory requirements based on Building Information Modeling (BIM). The methodology was structured around three pillars: (i) field studies with the CGPA/SAC technical team, (ii) iterative development of support tools for analysis, and (iii) application of multicriteria decision-making techniques. A total of 2,821 requirements, distributed across 35 technical specialties, were analyzed to identify codifiability patterns and normative prioritization. As key outcomes, hierarchical frameworks of the most relevant specialties, categories, and requirements were consolidated, including a synthetic ranking of the top five, ten, and fifteen specialties based on interviews with seven CGPA/SAC analysts. In addition, a proof-of-concept test was conducted in the Solibri Office® environment, demonstrating the feasibility of automating selected rules. These findings support the implementation of an automated verification pipeline within SAC, promoting greater efficiency, traceability, and standardization in the technical acceptance of airport project submissions.
Palavras-chave: Airport; Acceptance Process; BIM; Multicriteria Analysis; Evaluation